Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 18:22:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 18:22:08 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:21517 "HELO garrincha.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 18:21:55 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 19:24:49 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Szakacsits Szabolcs cc: Robert Love , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] strict VM overcommit for stock 2.4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 696 Lines: 23 On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote: > And my point was that, this is only part of the solution > making Linux a more reliable I see no reason to not merge this (useful) part. Not only is it useful on its own, it's also a necessary ingredient of whatever "complete solution" to control per-user resource limits. regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/