Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 18:21:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 18:21:08 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:3085 "HELO garrincha.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 18:19:42 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 19:22:17 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Szakacsits Szabolcs cc: Robert Love , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] strict VM overcommit for stock 2.4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1072 Lines: 28 On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote: > On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote: > > And my point (you asked for comments) was that, this is only (the > > harder) part of the solution making Linux a more reliable (no OOM > > killing *and* root always has the control) and cost effective platform > > (no need for occasionally very complex and continuous resource limit > > setup/adjusting, especially for inexpert home/etc users). > > Ahh, I figured out your target, embedded devices. Yes it's good for > that but not enough for general purpose. However, you NEED this patch in order to implement something that is good enough for general purpose (ie. per-user resource accounting). regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/