Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755579Ab1DGLDL (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2011 07:03:11 -0400 Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:52401 "EHLO mail-qw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754897Ab1DGLDI (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2011 07:03:08 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=hdg11Lyzg4xyRTC2Y/ydOOG+O+9oJUmsZadSRz3dhv6o3ZmElvY76whQxHxht5GkVr 5qxE4ec5LC4xw70b38vFK4KIyp62AnE4Eq7rcJc0rvSVI/IbHkKqDTj5Ay7inMVxwggB 4vr77Stv7P97E5cJcmym3y76KUxWx8Y/+gWOA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 13:03:08 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6] Revert "net: Allow no-cache copy from user on transmit" From: Sedat Dilek To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-next , Tom Herbert Cc: Jay Vosburgh , Andy Gospodarek , "David S. Miller" , Alexey Kuznetsov , "Pekka Savola (ipv6)" , James Morris , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , Patrick McHardy , Eric Dumazet , Changli Gao , Jesse Gross , =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBNaXJvc8WCYXc=?= , Ben Hutchings , Stanislaw Gruszka , Kees Cook , Stephen Rothwell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2219 Lines: 58 ...will try the patch from [1]: - Sedat - [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=130215119417648&w=2 On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > [ The long CC list I got via ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl ] > > Hi, > > with yesterday's linux-next (next-20110406) I discovered first time > network problems. > Today's next-20110407 shows the same symptoms. > In my IRC client the connection via SSL-encryption to freenode and > oftc are not established. > Also, I saw "stalls" on websites in firefox. > > Luckily, next-20110405 was OK, so I started to look at the > net-next-2.6 merge and its commits. > ( Furthermore, I tested a 2.6.39-rc2 vanilla kernel to ensure the > problem comes from linux-next patch. ) > > By reverting all 10 commits my system worked as expected, here the list: > > 0001-Revert-net-Allow-no-cache-copy-from-user-on-transmit.patch > 0002-Revert-bridge-range-check-STP-parameters.patch > 0003-Revert-bridge-allow-creating-bridge-devices-with-net.patch > 0004-Revert-bridge-allow-creating-deleting-fdb-entries-vi.patch > 0005-Revert-bridge-add-netlink-notification-on-forward-en.patch > 0006-Revert-bridge-split-rcu-and-no-rcu-cases-of-fdb-look.patch > 0007-Revert-bridge-track-last-used-time-in-forwarding-tab.patch > 0008-Revert-bridge-change-arguments-to-fdb_create.patch > 0009-Revert-pkt_sched-QFQ-quick-fair-queue-scheduler.patch > 0010-Revert-xen-netfront-assume-all-hw-features-are-avail.patch > > In a next run, I started with only > "0001-Revert-net-Allow-no-cache-copy-from-user-on-transmit.patch". > It turned out that this is the culprit commit. > ( I have not played with the new ethtool option tx-nocache-copy in > "BROKEN" kernel. ) > > My wificard is an Atheros ath5k. > I attached my kernel-config and the revert-patch which makes the > system stable again. > > Can you have a look at it? > > I you want me to help with debugging, please give me precise instructions. > > Regards, > - Sedat - > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/