Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 20:17:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 20:17:00 -0400 Received: from vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca ([136.159.55.21]:18053 "EHLO vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 20:17:00 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 18:19:53 -0600 Message-Id: <200207190019.g6J0JrM28129@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> From: Richard Gooch To: Alexander Viro Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Rusty's module talk at the Kernel Summit In-Reply-To: References: <20020711051232.5F93844F8@lists.samba.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 892 Lines: 21 Alexander Viro writes: > Call them well-behaving modules if you wish. For these the answers > are "yes"/"a lot of things can be"/"it's easy to handle". What's > left? The pieces of code with really complex interfaces. And guess > what, race-prevention is complex for these guys - and it's not just > about rmmod races. E.g. parts of procfs, sysctls and devfs are > still quite racy even if you compile everything into the tree and > remove all module-related syscalls completely. Can you point to specific problems with the current devfs code? Regards, Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/