Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753885Ab1DIHke (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Apr 2011 03:40:34 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:46375 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753675Ab1DIHkd (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Apr 2011 03:40:33 -0400 Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 09:40:09 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Anthony Liguori , Pekka Enberg , Avi Kivity , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org, penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, asias.hejun@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native Linux KVM tool Message-ID: <20110409074009.GA25729@elte.hu> References: <4D982E89.8070502@redhat.com> <4D9847BC.9060906@redhat.com> <4D98716D.9040307@codemonkey.ws> <4D9873CD.3080207@redhat.com> <20110406093333.GB6465@elte.hu> <4D9E6F6E.9050709@codemonkey.ws> <4D9F150B.1030809@codemonkey.ws> <20110408192039.GJ29444@random.random> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110408192039.GJ29444@random.random> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1416 Lines: 37 * Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > [...] I thought the whole point of a native kvm tool was to go all the > paravirt way to provide max performance and maybe also depend on vhost as > much as possible. To me it's more than that: today i can use it to minimally boot test various native bzImages just by typing: kvm run ./bzImage this will get me past most of the kernel init, up to the point where it would try to mount user-space. ( That's rather powerful to me personally, as i introduce most of my bugs to these stages of kernel bootup - and as a kernel developer i'm not alone there ;-) I would be sad if i were forced to compile in some sort of paravirt support, just to be able to boot-test random native kernel images. Really, if you check the code, serial console and timer support is not a big deal complexity-wise and it is rather useful: git pull git://github.com/penberg/linux-kvm master So i think up to a point hardware emulation is both fun to implement (it's fun to be on the receiving end of hw calls, for a change) and a no-brainer to have from a usability POV. How far it wants to go we'll see! :-) Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/