Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 08:06:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 08:05:59 -0500 Received: from pincoya.inf.utfsm.cl ([200.1.19.3]:49933 "EHLO pincoya.inf.utfsm.cl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 08:05:52 -0500 Message-Id: <200012141232.eBECWRc30301@pincoya.inf.utfsm.cl> To: Alan Cox cc: kaos@ocs.com.au (Keith Owens), chris@chrullrich.de (Christian Ullrich), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: insmod problem after modutils upgrading In-Reply-To: Message from Alan Cox of "Wed, 13 Dec 2000 22:13:29 -0000." Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 09:32:27 -0300 From: Horst von Brand Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox said: > In-Reply-To: <4381.976745113@ocs3.ocs-net> from "Keith Owens" at Dec 14, 2000 0 > ***9:05:13 AM > > previously because nobody used those options. Since these are bugs in > > the modules and only a few modules are affected (less than 5 reported), > > the fix is to correct the modules that have coding errors. > That wont be happening in 2.2 until 2.2.19 which probably means 6 months. > If this is your decision please make it abundantly clear that the new > modutils are a 2.4 only package. Why can't you make a fast 2.2.19 with _just_ safe bug fixes (as the fixing of these module problems certainly is)? -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand mailto:vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/