Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 03:12:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 03:12:25 -0400 Received: from divine.city.tvnet.hu ([195.38.100.154]:15388 "EHLO divine.city.tvnet.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 03:12:24 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 08:17:22 +0200 (MEST) From: Szakacsits Szabolcs To: Alan Cox cc: Robert Love , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] strict VM overcommit for stock 2.4 In-Reply-To: <1027022323.8154.38.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 849 Lines: 21 On 18 Jul 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > Adjusting the percentages to have a root only zone is doable. It helps > in some conceivable cases but not all. For 2.2 kernels I've found 5 MB reserved from swap until it was needed was enough to ssh to the box and fix whatever was going on (whatever: real world cases like slashdot effects, exploits from packetstorm and other own made testcases that heavily overcommited memory). Nevertheless the amount reserved was controllable via /proc. And I do know it doesn't solve all cases but covering 99% of the real world issues isn't a bad start at all, imho. Szaka - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/