Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754736Ab1DKMTa (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:19:30 -0400 Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:56148 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754058Ab1DKMT3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:19:29 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=xypvw8Rtv4+LzXyM5fvw2Iur/M8EQez3s5TXRmLNaHPpotnysacgDIVm2FT6rV/oKl sXZZRaovvqC/7PK2GzxMR6Ip5XSliv01bbGP1jGhDUM7aoL6VZGjoLzB69clKeuAgYq/ PkDq0or67to9ClJfP7ZAq1z3UwoC2/4uuA3G0= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110411040544.GB21395@dastard> References: <1302444629-17043-1-git-send-email-wanlong.gao@gmail.com> <1302444629-17043-5-git-send-email-wanlong.gao@gmail.com> <20110411040544.GB21395@dastard> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 20:19:28 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] xfs:removed the unused variable From: wanlong gao To: Dave Chinner Cc: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, geert@linux-m68k.org, starvik@axis.com, jesper.nilsson@axis.com, sameo@linux.intel.com, ian@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, dp@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, lrg@slimlogic.co.uk, James.Bottomley@suse.de, aelder@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1313 Lines: 44 On 4/11/11, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:10:29PM +0800, wanlong.gao@gmail.com wrote: >> From: Wanlong Gao >> >> removed the unused variable "bdi" of xfs_buf.c . >> >> Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao >> --- >> fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c | 2 -- >> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c >> index 5ea4020..a125b32 100644 >> --- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c >> +++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c >> @@ -657,8 +657,6 @@ xfs_buf_readahead( >> xfs_off_t ioff, >> size_t isize) >> { >> - struct backing_dev_info *bdi; >> - >> if (bdi_read_congested(target->bt_bdi)) >> return; > > > > Doesn't anyone look anymore to see if a problem has already been > reported before or fixed in the maintainers tree? > > FYI, you're about the 5th person to send this same patch.... > Sorry for the dupe, I'll look anymore next time . > Cheers, > > Dave. > -- > Dave Chinner > david@fromorbit.com > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/