Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 08:40:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 08:40:42 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:28939 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 08:40:32 -0500 From: Russell King Message-Id: <200012141308.eBED8Oh06198@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than UP 2.4.0-test12 To: R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl (Rogier Wolff) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:08:23 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200012130944.KAA30595@cave.bitwizard.nl> from "Rogier Wolff" at Dec 13, 2000 10:44:38 AM X-Location: london.england.earth.mulky-way.universe X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rogier Wolff writes: > Alan Cox wrote: > > What better interactivity ;) > Thus to me, 2.4 FEELS much less interactive. When I move windows they > don't follow the mouse in real-time. Interesting observation: in a scrolling rxvt, kernel 2.0 is smoother than 2.2, which is smoother than 2.4. I hope this trend isn't going to continue to 2.6. ;( _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King rmk@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/