Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756767Ab1DLHN1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2011 03:13:27 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]:37330 "EHLO mail-yw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756727Ab1DLHNZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2011 03:13:25 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=qOQU4k3rLZGqsUXJWClkqS3hitGm/MqWiAFZw8eyxvcnUvcQRmq1pkG/3nF2lBFxE4 sMs0UwN4x2rPWAfdhb8P5Kk1d09vzL/pNGTgxs5mQi+J8TnezRXZJd8rybNZMy22/oZ6 pL8mEf6O5YY+8XwAoeZwXzXE6lDQ/cVYzfLyw= Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:13:18 +0900 From: Tejun Heo To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: LKML , Yinghai Lu , Brian Gerst , Cyrill Gorcunov , Shaohui Zheng , David Rientjes , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64, NUMA: reimplement cpu node map initialization for fake numa Message-ID: <20110412071318.GA10425@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <20110412040037.GK9673@mtj.dyndns.org> <20110412133842.6A37.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110412153212.B514.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110412153212.B514.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 992 Lines: 27 Hello, KOSAKI. On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 03:31:42PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > Unfortunately, don't work. > full dmesg is below. ... > [ 0.220979] ERROR: groups don't span domain->span > [ 0.222122] divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP > [ 0.222975] last sysfs file: > [ 0.222975] CPU 0 > [ 0.222975] Modules linked in: > [ 0.222975] > [ 0.222975] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.39-rc1+ #2 FUJITSU-SV Hmmm... looks like the added condition didn't trigger at all. I'm travelling until the end of the next week and can only test using qemu which I don't think supports sibling topology. Can you please add some printks in the sibling link function and find out why the condition isn't triggering? Thank you. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/