Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 09:07:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 09:07:25 -0400 Received: from smtp.intrex.net ([209.42.192.250]:36364 "EHLO intrex.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 09:07:25 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 09:16:53 -0400 From: jlnance@intrex.net To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6] The List, pass #2 Message-ID: <20020719091653.C1759@tricia.dyndns.org> References: <3D3761A9.23960.8EB1A2@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3D3761A9.23960.8EB1A2@localhost>; from boissiere@adiglobal.com on Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 12:47:37AM -0400 X-Declude-Sender: jlnance@intrex.net [216.181.42.97] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 962 Lines: 21 On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 12:47:37AM -0400, Guillaume Boissiere wrote: > ---------------------------------------------------- > Likely to be merged before feature freeze: I resisted playing devils advocate yesterday, but I just cant do it anymore :-) Does anyone want to speculate as to how many feature freezes we will have this time around? Historically the kernel release cycle has been an interesting process. I remember jumping to version 0.95 because 1.0 was really close, maby even ready by Christmas.... Jim PS: Please dont take this as a criticism of anybody. I certainly couldnt do any better. Its just funny to remember all the times we have done this before and how it has always worked out. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/