Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 09:56:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 09:56:13 -0400 Received: from mnh-1-22.mv.com ([207.22.10.54]:24068 "EHLO ccure.karaya.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 09:56:13 -0400 Message-Id: <200207191502.KAA02022@ccure.karaya.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 To: Rusty Russell Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] check shm mount succeeded in shmem_file_setup In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 19 Jul 2002 17:53:06 +1000." <20020719080027.EEA964479@lists.samba.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 10:02:21 -0500 From: Jeff Dike Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 522 Lines: 14 rusty@rustcorp.com.au said: > And if the initialization fails at boot, we're screwed anyway. Why? If it fails, it still boots fine until something tries using shared memory. With UML and my Debian fs, that's Apache, which is the last thing before the gettys run. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/