Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 12:31:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 12:31:11 -0400 Received: from w089.z209220022.nyc-ny.dsl.cnc.net ([209.220.22.89]:9864 "HELO yucs.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 12:31:10 -0400 Subject: Re: more thoughts on a new jail() system call From: Shaya Potter To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1027095858.2634.48.camel@zaphod> References: <1026959170.14737.102.camel@zaphod> <1027095858.2634.48.camel@zaphod> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.7 Date: 19 Jul 2002 12:34:01 -0400 Message-Id: <1027096442.2635.54.camel@zaphod> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 670 Lines: 18 On Fri, 2002-07-19 at 12:24, Shaya Potter wrote: > On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 20:21, David Wagner wrote: > > >sys_syslog) NOT SURE (probably jailed away) > > > > sys_syslog touches a global shared resource, hence > > should probably be denied to jailed processes. > > or virtualized. forget that, stupid, sys_syslog only deals with printk buffer, not normal syslogd. so lock it away from jails, system deals with it normally. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/