Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 13:08:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 13:08:56 -0400 Received: from ophelia.ess.nec.de ([193.141.139.8]:19620 "EHLO ophelia.ess.nec.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 13:08:55 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Erich Focht To: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH]: scheduler complex macros fixes Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 19:11:48 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 Cc: linux-kernel , linux-ia64 , Linus Torvalds References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200207191911.48427.efocht@ess.nec.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1048 Lines: 30 Hi Ingo, On Saturday 20 July 2002 18:57, Ingo Molnar wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jul 2002, Erich Focht wrote: > > The attached patch fixes problems with the "complex" macros in the > > scheduler, as discussed about a week ago with Ingo on this mailing list. > > the fix has been in my tree for some time, the latest version, against > 2.5.26 is at: > > http://people.redhat.com/mingo/O(1)-scheduler/sched-2.5.26-B7 > > it has a number of other fixes as well, plus the SCHED_BATCH feature. > > Ingo Thanks. But as long as SCHED_BATCH ins't in 2.5.X, we need this separate fix. And if it's in the main tree, you don't need it additionally in your patches. The fix is O(1) specific and I thought it should not hide inside the SCHED_BATCH patches, some people might encounter these problems... Regards, Erich - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/