Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S316996AbSGSTvb>; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 15:51:31 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S316997AbSGSTvb>; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 15:51:31 -0400
Received: from freeside.toyota.com ([63.87.74.7]:19473 "EHLO
	freeside.toyota.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S316996AbSGSTv2>; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 15:51:28 -0400
Message-ID: <3D386E70.4040401@lexus.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 12:54:24 -0700
From: J Sloan <jjs@lexus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020716
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: anton wilson <anton.wilson@camotion.com>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4 O(1) scheduler
References: <200207191943.PAA00351@test-area.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 834
Lines: 29

Use 2.4-aa, 2.4-ac or 2.4-redhat kernel
and you get the O(1) secheduler at
no extra cost -

Joe

anton wilson wrote:

>	
>
>I'm working on a project that uses the O(1) scheduler and I am forced to use 
>a 2.4 kernel for time issues. Will the O(1) patches for 2.4 kernels be 
>updated once the 2.5.26+ patch becomes stable?
>
>Anton
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>  
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/