Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758484Ab1DMUNI (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:13:08 -0400 Received: from lucidpixels.com ([75.144.35.66]:59483 "EHLO lucidpixels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757196Ab1DMUNG (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:13:06 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:13:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Justin Piszcz To: Daniel Halperin cc: Ivo Van Doorn , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.38: rt2800usb: high latency (1000ms)? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="655872-585702368-1302725582=:10727" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3908 Lines: 108 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --655872-585702368-1302725582=:10727 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, Daniel Halperin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Justin Piszcz = wrote: >> Hi, >> >> When powersave is enabled, it is very jumpy, I've used satellite comms >> before >> and (~600ms-1200ms was more smooth) as it did not jump around as much. = =A0The >> application is just a standalone desktop with minimal activity for the >> majority >> of the time, maybe thats why.. >> >> With powersave disabled, I now see 0% packet loss (802.11n) and low ping >> times, this looks like the proper solution for the wireless USB device I >> am using. =A0By the way, is it possible/are there wireless USB devices o= ut >> there >> that support wake on wireless lan (WOWL? >> >> Your ping command with power off: >> 1408 bytes from server (192.168.1.2): icmp_req=3D539 ttl=3D64 time=3D1.0= 7 ms >> 1408 bytes from server (192.168.1.2): icmp_req=3D540 ttl=3D64 time=3D1.3= 1 ms >> 1408 bytes from server (192.168.1.2): icmp_req=3D541 ttl=3D64 time=3D1.0= 7 ms >> 1408 bytes from server (192.168.1.2): icmp_req=3D542 ttl=3D64 time=3D1.2= 6 ms >> >> Your ping command with power on: >> 1408 bytes from server (192.168.1.2): icmp_req=3D649 ttl=3D64 time=3D1.8= 0 ms >> 1408 bytes from server (192.168.1.2): icmp_req=3D650 ttl=3D64 time=3D1.8= 5 ms >> 1408 bytes from server (192.168.1.2): icmp_req=3D651 ttl=3D64 time=3D2.8= 6 ms >> 1408 bytes from server (192.168.1.2): icmp_req=3D652 ttl=3D64 time=3D1.4= 6 ms >> >> You are correct, if there is a lot of traffic, its good, but if the syst= em >> is relatively idle and all that's going on is an SSH session, there is >> horrible >> latency. > > Gotcha. I might still look around in the network stack and/or driver > and see what the time constants are. For instance: > > (1) What is the AP's beacon period and DTIM? Typical values are 100 > TUs for beacons (102.4 ms) and 2 for DTIM (2 beacons per power-save > wakeup) which should imply a mean of 100 and max of 200 ms delay even > on pings. I am using a WNDR3700 with default settings in terms of beacons/etc. No issues with any device (laptop, computer, etc (in windows)), I have two wireless USB adapters (bought two) and in Windows, no problems, I don't thi= nk it is the WNDR3700. As far as linux/wpa-supplicant, using default settings= =2E > > (2) How long does the client wait after waking up to go back to sleep? > It should be at least a few seconds. For ssh, then, you should see > something like a 100-200 ms delay for the first key and then nothing > at all unless you stop typing for a bit. It lags with each word I type, it is terrible. If I run something like dmesg or ps auxww, the entire session freezes for 5-10 seconds before it comes back. > > I'm SSHing over a Wi-Fi link that uses power save right this second, > and have for years. It's not generally an issue, I suspect something > worse is going on. Maybe the wireless usb adapters do not function well in Linux with power sa= ve on. I bought them awhile ago, they had the highest reviews, and in Windows, they did do 10-15MiB/s, in Linux, I see ~4.6MiB/s (but that was with power= =20 save on) about the same, 4.5MiB/s. http://www.amazon.com/Medialink-Wireless-Adapter-802-11n-Compatible/dp/B002= RM08RE 100+0 records in 100+0 records out 104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 23.2803 s, 4.5 MB/s Justin. --655872-585702368-1302725582=:10727-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/