Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758582Ab1DMUxG (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:53:06 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:47327 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757779Ab1DMUxE (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:53:04 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fa+Ep8Z4qX75/JCADIMaWqtt5KxcQVHxqTQOUhWb7xPXa6bTeQFXAMzloKOuVuJ6jb dw7EDuEzf2bNZ/fLAHs4B45U3iJn7emqgqvXCp7q0uil1iBQCbs/DVrOZqyGvrJvQJk0 rqf2wKYn/XWiJLQOyooo4Cp1S7MDD8h4TiFHU= Message-ID: <4DA60B03.30603@openvz.org> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 00:43:47 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shaun Ruffell CC: maciej.rutecki@gmail.com, Don Zickus , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Lin Ming Subject: Re: [regression 2.6.39-rc2][bisected] "perf, x86: P4 PMU - Read proper MSR register to catch" and NMIs References: <20110406223036.GA15721@digium.com> <201104132133.51958.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> <4DA6011F.7070405@openvz.org> <20110413203501.GA10744@digium.com> In-Reply-To: <20110413203501.GA10744@digium.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 927 Lines: 24 On 04/14/2011 12:35 AM, Shaun Ruffell wrote: ... > > I had the first version of the patch running the test builds all night without > any NMIs. I installed this one and ran it through the case where I would > reliably get early NMIs and it still no NMIs. > > So for v2: > Tested-by: Shaun Ruffell > > Thanks! Thanks a huge Shaun. The thing is (if only I don't miss something) at moment there is no much difference in which patch to pick up. But as only kgdb dives in or any other subsystem (which say would use same manner of nmi delivery) we might be unmasking lvt entry even if nothing were handled at all, so I bias to a second version. -- Cyrill -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/