Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 19:03:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 19:03:09 -0400 Received: from hdfdns02.hd.intel.com ([192.52.58.11]:8905 "EHLO mail2.hd.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 19:03:08 -0400 Message-ID: <288F9BF66CD9D5118DF400508B68C4460283E2F5@orsmsx113.jf.intel.com> From: "Feldman, Scott" To: "'J.A. Magallon'" , Andrea Arcangeli Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: 2.4.19rc2aa1 Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 16:05:55 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1228 Lines: 35 Jamagallon wrote: > >diff between 2.4.19rc1aa2 and 2.4.19rc1aa2: > > > >Only in 2.4.19rc1aa2: 000_e100-2.0.30-k1.gz > >Only in 2.4.19rc2aa1: 000_e100-2.1.6.gz > >Only in 2.4.19rc1aa2: 000_e1000-4.2.17-k1.gz > >Only in 2.4.19rc2aa1: 000_e1000-4.3.2.gz > > >More on this. >We have two interfaces: >04:04.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 08) 03:01.0 Ethernet >controller: Intel Corp. 82543GC Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 02) >NetPipe (tcp) shows numbers like 80Mb/s for e100 and 500Mb/s for e1000. So efficiency is much >much higher for e100 driver+card than e1000. I have to dig, perhaps e100 is doing zerocopy and >e1000 is not ? >Any ideas ? If e100 is sending from the zerocopy path, e1000 is doing the same. There are several factors that may be limiting your throughput on e1000. Assuming you have enough CPU umph and bus bandwidth, and your netpipe link partner and switch are willing, you should be able to approach wire speed. -scott - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/