Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 20:09:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 20:09:07 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:34574 "HELO garrincha.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 20:09:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 21:11:45 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Hans Reiser cc: Andreas Dilger , Michael Hohnbaum , "Martin J. Bligh" , Guillaume Boissiere , Subject: Re: [2.6] Most likely to be merged by Halloween... THE LIST] In-Reply-To: <3D38A29C.9040901@namesys.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 923 Lines: 29 On Sat, 20 Jul 2002, Hans Reiser wrote: > I, in my egocentrism, think it would make more sense to have a deadline > for submission rather than a deadline for acceptance, It's both. We all know Linus doesn't have the time to keep forward-porting our hundreds of patches so he can only include patches into his kernel that apply to the exact same tree he has at that day. This (and the fact that Linus gets far too much email and patches to look at old ones) is bound to make the Halloween deadline stick for both submission and acceptance. I hope. regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/