Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759286Ab1DNQWZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:22:25 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:44905 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759255Ab1DNQWY (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:22:24 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:22:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, lrg@ti.com, sameo@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] TPS65910: IRQ: Add interrupt controller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 820 Lines: 24 On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Jorge Eduardo Candelaria wrote: > +static void tps65910_irq_lock(unsigned int irq) > +static void tps65910_irq_sync_unlock(unsigned int irq) > +static void tps65910_irq_enable(unsigned int irq) > +static void tps65910_irq_disable(unsigned int irq) > + > +static struct irq_chip tps65910_irq_chip = { > + .name = "tps65910", > + .irq_bus_lock = tps65910_irq_lock, > + .irq_bus_sync_unlock = tps65910_irq_sync_unlock, > + .irq_disable = tps65910_irq_disable, > + .irq_enable = tps65910_irq_enable, > +}; Care to explain how that compiles? Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/