Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 21:05:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 21:05:42 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:20484 "HELO garrincha.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 21:05:41 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 22:08:27 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Hans Reiser cc: Andreas Dilger , Michael Hohnbaum , "Martin J. Bligh" , Guillaume Boissiere , Subject: Re: [2.6] Most likely to be merged by Halloween... THE LIST] In-Reply-To: <3D38B485.8020503@namesys.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 971 Lines: 29 On Sat, 20 Jul 2002, Hans Reiser wrote: > What I was advocating was a schedule of: > 1) feature submission deadline > 2) period of working through feature backlog > 3) feature acceptance ending date So, what feature are you trying to smuggle into the kernel but are afraid isn't ready on time and why do you think it couldn't be backported into 2.6 later, when 2.6 is stable ? I can't really think of anything that couldn't be backported later on, by the time people start actually using 2.6, but maybe you've got something so fundamental it just has to be merged before the feature freeze ... ;) regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/