Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:12:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:12:08 -0500 Received: from gherkin.sa.wlk.com ([192.158.254.49]:56068 "HELO gherkin.sa.wlk.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:11:56 -0500 Message-Id: From: rct@gherkin.sa.wlk.com (Bob_Tracy) Subject: Re: test12 lockups -- need feedback In-Reply-To: <3A38B9C8.B11C4ABC@haque.net> "from Mohammad A. Haque at Dec 14, 2000 07:15:04 am" To: "Mohammad A. Haque" Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 08:41:20 -0600 (CST) CC: dep , linux-kernel X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL82 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mohammad A. Haque wrote: > Were you connected to a network or receiving/sending anything? > > dep wrote: > > > > okay. got it here this morning, too. solid lock -- no dumping out of > > x, no changing terminals, no mouse, no keyboard. > > > > k6-2-550 @ 500; 256mb memory, fic 503a mb with via chipset. This one is going to be fun to track down. So far, with a personal sample size of three machines, 2.4.0-test12 is stable on two, locks up in a predictable and repeatable manner on one. First, the stable machines: (1) P150 MMX Toshiba Tecra 730XCDT notebook, egcs-2.91.66, openwin with XFree86 3.3.6. (2) Cyrix 6x86 MII 233, egcs-2.91.66, AfterStep with XFree86 4.0.1, NVIDIA-0.9-5 video driver. The unstable machine: Gateway PII 333, egcs-2.91.66, AfterStep with XFree86 3.3.6. Running "startx" as "root" --> ok: no problem. Running "startx" as normal user --> I get as far as the grey moire pattern with the black "X" cursor in the center of the screen, and the machine locks up solid. Cannot switch consoles, machine doesn't respond to pings (much less remote access attempts), no disk activity, no "oops" messages in any of the logfiles. Absolutely repeatable. Machine works fine with earlier kernels. Does anyone have a feeling one way or the other as far as this being related to the CPU type? I can try building a pre-PII CPU kernel on the unstable machine and see if that makes any difference. -- Bob Tracy rct@frus.com ----------------------------------------------------------------- "We might not be in hell, but we can see the gates from here." --Phoenix resident, Summer of 2000 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/