Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753651Ab1DNVV6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:21:58 -0400 Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37]:64627 "EHLO mx2.netapp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753572Ab1DNVVx convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:21:53 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,213,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="541458437" Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS: Fix infinite loop in gss_create_upcall() From: Trond Myklebust To: Jiri Slaby Cc: Bryan Schumaker , Jiri Slaby , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, ML netdev , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <4DA75AFC.3040000@suse.cz> References: <201103312224.p2VMOA5g000983@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <4D96E4C5.2080302@suse.cz> <1302122693.16786.0.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <4D9D5CC9.2040002@suse.cz> <4DA36722.2020402@suse.cz> <4DA36758.4070203@suse.cz> <4DA36DB6.8060108@suse.cz> <4DA48EB0.40600@netapp.com> <4DA4946D.5020403@suse.cz> <1302633088.4801.48.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <4DA49B49.1020005@suse.cz> <4DA49D3A.7090800@netapp.com> <4DA49F7F.8060005@suse.cz> <4DA60AB9.1050104@netapp.com> <4DA75AFC.3040000@suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Organization: NetApp Inc Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:21:35 -0400 Message-ID: <1302816095.24028.87.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 (2.32.2-1.fc14) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Apr 2011 21:21:37.0907 (UTC) FILETIME=[F07A6C30:01CBFAE9] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3162 Lines: 81 On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 22:37 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 04/13/2011 10:42 PM, Bryan Schumaker wrote: > > On 04/12/2011 02:52 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > >> On 04/12/2011 08:43 PM, Bryan Schumaker wrote: > >>> On 04/12/2011 02:34 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > >>>> On 04/12/2011 08:31 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: > >>>>>> Yes, it fixes the problem. But it waits 15s before it times out. This is > >>>>>> inacceptable for automounted NFS dirs. > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm still confused as to why you are hitting it at all. In the normal > >>>>> autonegotiation case, the client should be trying to use AUTH_SYS first > >>>>> and then trying rpcsec_gss if and only if that fails. > >>>>> > >>>>> Are you really exporting a filesystem using AUTH_NULL as the only > >>>>> supported flavour? > >>>> > >>>> I don't know, I connect to a nfs server which is not maintained by me. > >>>> It looks like that. How can I find out? > >>> > >>> If you're not using gss for anything, you could try rmmod-ing rpcsec_gss_krb5 (and other rpcsec_gss_* modules). > >> > >> I don't have NFS in modules. It's all built-in. And this one is > >> unconditionally selected because of CONFIG_NFS_V4. > > > > Does this patch help? > > Nope, it makes things even worse: > # mount -oro,intr XXX:/yyy /mnt/c/ > <15s delay here> > mount.nfs: access denied by server while mounting XXX:/yyy > > So in nfs4_proc_get_root I do: > printk("%s: %d %u\n", __func__, i, flav_array[i]); > status = nfs4_lookup_root_sec(server, fhandle, info, flav_array[i]); > printk("%s: res=%d\n", __func__, status); > and get: > [ 18.159818] nfs4_proc_get_root: 0 1 > [ 18.214872] nfs4_proc_get_root: res=-1 > [ 18.214875] nfs4_proc_get_root: 1 0 > [ 18.254636] nfs4_proc_get_root: res=-1 > [ 18.254639] nfs4_proc_get_root: 2 390003 > [ 33.252174] RPC: AUTH_GSS upcall timed out. > [ 33.252177] Please check user daemon is running. > [ 33.252192] nfs4_proc_get_root: res=-13 > > If I revert that back and do the same: > [ 28.275569] nfs4_proc_get_root: 0 1 > [ 28.296545] nfs4_proc_get_root: res=-1 > [ 28.296548] nfs4_proc_get_root: 1 390003 > [ 43.296107] RPC: AUTH_GSS upcall timed out. > [ 43.296108] Please check user daemon is running. > [ 43.296121] nfs4_proc_get_root: res=-13 > [ 43.296122] nfs4_proc_get_root: 2 0 > [ 43.318201] nfs4_proc_get_root: res=-1 > > I.e. all methods fail. And what matters is the last retval. From NULL it > is EPERM, from GSS it is EACCESS. For EPERM, mount(8) falls back to > nfs3, for EACCESS it dies terrible death. OK. That's good information. Thanks for testing! I'm still curious as to why that NFS server is refusing all NFSv4 mounts with NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC. Unless NFSv4 really is configured only to export the root filesystem with RPCSEC_GSS, then that definitely sounds like a bug... Cheers Trond -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer NetApp Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com www.netapp.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/