Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753966Ab1DNWNw (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:13:52 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:59571 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753885Ab1DNWNv (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:13:51 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,213,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="733528573" Message-ID: <4DA7719F.4060905@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:13:51 -0700 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Eric Dumazet , Peter Zijlstra , Linux Stable , John Kacur , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH V4] futex: set FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT during demux for FUTEX_WAIT References: <20110414215656.GB14169@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20110414215656.GB14169@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1770 Lines: 43 On 04/14/2011 02:56 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 02:43:01PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: >> The FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT flag was not getting set, causing the restart_block to >> restart futex_wait() without a timeout after a signal. >> >> Commit b41277dc7a18ee332d in 2.6.38 introduced the regression by accidentally >> removing the the FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT assignment from futex_wait() during the setup >> of the restart block. Restore the originaly behavior. >> >> Fixes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32922 >> >> V2: Added references to commit message. >> V3: Set flag during restart block instead of do_futex() >> V4: Correct stupid order of assignment mistake pointed out by Eric >> >> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart >> Reported-by: Tim Smith >> Reported-by: Torsten Hilbrich >> Cc: Thomas Gleixner >> Cc: Peter Zijlstra >> Cc: Ingo Molnar >> CC: Eric Dumazet >> CC: John Kacur >> --- > > This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the > stable kernel tree. Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt > for how to do this properly. Sigh, apologies. Fixing, will add stable to CC: in changelog. Gives me a chance to improve the subject anyway. Ingo, Greg, please ignore this and the previous V[123] patches. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/