Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753924Ab1DONVd (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:21:33 -0400 Received: from gmmr4.centrum.cz ([90.183.38.143]:57715 "EHLO gmmr4.centrum.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751910Ab1DONVc (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:21:32 -0400 To: "Mel Gorman" Subject: Re: Regression from 2.6.36 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:21:30 +0200 From: "azurIt" Cc: "Andrew Morton" , "Eric Dumazet" , "Changli Gao" , "Am?rico Wang" , "Jiri Slaby" , , , , "Jiri Slaby" References: <1302178426.3357.34.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1302190586.3357.45.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20110412154906.70829d60.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110412183132.a854bffc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1302662256.2811.27.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20110413141600.28793661.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110414102501.GE11871@csn.ul.ie> <20110415115903.315DEAA1@pobox.sk> <20110415104700.GD22688@suse.de> <20110415125651.68156745@pobox.sk> <1302866247.12428.25.camel@machina.109elm.lan> <20110415133644.12504ADB@pobox.sk> <1302872460.12428.27.camel@machina.109elm.lan> In-Reply-To: <1302872460.12428.27.camel@machina.109elm.lan> X-Mailer: Centrum Email 5.3 X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20110415152130.AECAA367@pobox.sk> X-Maser: Georgo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1524 Lines: 42 So it's really not necessary ? It would be better for us if you can go without it cos it means to run buggy kernel for one more day. Which kernel versions will include this fix ? Thank you very much! azur ______________________________________________________________ > Od: "Mel Gorman" > Komu: azurIt > Dátum: 15.04.2011 15:01 > Predmet: Re: Regression from 2.6.36 > > CC: "Andrew Morton" , "Eric Dumazet" , "Changli Gao" , "Am?rico Wang" , "Jiri Slaby" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Jiri Slaby" >On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 13:36 +0200, azurIt wrote: >> sysfs was already mounted: >> >> # mount >> sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) >> >> >> I have enabled all of the options you suggested and also CONFIG_DEBUG_FS ;) I will boot new kernel this night. Hope it won't degraded performance much.. >> > >It's only for curiousity's sake. As you report the patch fixes the >problem, it matches the theory that it's allocator latency. The script >would confirm it for sure, but it's not a high priority. > >-- >Mel Gorman >SUSE Labs > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/