Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 20 Jul 2002 10:27:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 20 Jul 2002 10:27:50 -0400 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:40203 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 20 Jul 2002 10:27:49 -0400 Message-ID: <3D3972C3.2010307@evision.ag> Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 16:25:07 +0200 From: Marcin Dalecki Reply-To: martin@dalecki.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020625 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, pl, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Russell King , "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [announce, patch, RFC] "big IRQ lock" removal, IRQ cleanups. References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 533 Lines: 14 > RMK, is there any chance to get your new serial layer into 2.5 sometime > soon? ['soon' as in 'tomorrow' :-) ] That is perhaps one of the biggest Well I would like to allo wmysefl to allow a tad bit of advocacy for this step. I looked at it already quite a time ago and *second* it! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/