Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753231Ab1DPTyP (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:54:15 -0400 Received: from mail-px0-f179.google.com ([209.85.212.179]:61791 "EHLO mail-px0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751997Ab1DPTyH convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:54:07 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hkz6A7bhUZEkaceeikN3fZK5GYki6HN7x7MxWHcMuljOseUkOP1VqGVjyIKy7gna9I w3BIgt89PDtSr5G0baBaH+sxsxMzElDoDsIKVV9SoCIWWSdD+s1vsrrC04aRtG7GIC6u pwOkZhBefATKggSGDWSoDGKJ3ZCGl96MefswA= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <81798.1302983165@localhost> References: <20110416135912.GA1044@merkur.ravnborg.org> <61322.1302964434@localhost> <62853.1302966525@localhost> <81798.1302983165@localhost> Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 21:54:06 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Kbuild: how to cleanly retrieve information compilation about the last build From: Francis Moreau To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Sam Ravnborg , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1371 Lines: 34 On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 9:46 PM, wrote: > On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 17:57:23 +0200, Francis Moreau said: > >> The user modify a file, then instead of calling 'make' (because he >> forgets) run the script that send the kernel image through the net on >> a test machine. Since the user had already compiled the kernel before, >> ?the kernel image exists but is outdated. > > As I said, this is an example of a broken development environment, or > possibly a broken developer. :) > ok I think you can just ignore that thread now, this and what you said below is just hmm, not revelant for me and for what I asked for. >> How can a script detect this case if it doesn't call 'make' in its turn ? > > Why do you care about detecting it without calling make? ?Just go ahead and > *do* it, if the kernel is up to date it won't take long. ?With a completely > cold cache, it takes about 90 seconds on my laptop. Really, what kind of laptop is it ? Are you compiling the kernel with just allnoconfig ? Seriously, I now think that what you say is totaly irrevelant, please just ignore my question. -- Francis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/