Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 20 Jul 2002 16:29:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 20 Jul 2002 16:29:39 -0400 Received: from adsl-216-62-200-99.dsl.austtx.swbell.net ([216.62.200.99]:61116 "HELO digitalroadkill.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 20 Jul 2002 16:29:38 -0400 Subject: Re: [2.6] Most likely to be merged by Halloween... THE LIST From: Austin Gonyou To: Alan Cox Cc: Mark Peloquin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1027199147.16819.39.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> References: <1027199147.16819.39.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1027197028.26159.2.camel@UberGeek.digitalroadkill.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.1.0.99 (Preview Release) Date: 20 Jul 2002 15:30:29 -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1028 Lines: 30 On Sat, 2002-07-20 at 16:05, Alan Cox wrote: ... > > > Do you think the breakdown is realistic? > > > > > > -- Guillaume > > > > o EVMS (Enterprise Volume Management System) (EVMS team) > > or LVM2, which already appears to be scrubbed down and clean Just IMHO, LVM2 makes better sense as there currently is no "stable" module for XFS in EVMS, AFAIK. Also, LVM is currently in 2.4 and a lot of peopel use it, LVM2 seems to be the proper progression for 2.6. My $0.02 > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Austin Gonyou - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/