Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756165Ab1DRRlh (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:41:37 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:45589 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754726Ab1DRRlb (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:41:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110418173224.GA27918@redhat.com> References: <20110418134421.GA15951@redhat.com> <20110418173224.GA27918@redhat.com> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:40:40 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] signal: sigprocmask fixes To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Tejun Heo , Andrew Morton , "Nikita V. Youshchenko" , Matt Fleming , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 732 Lines: 17 On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > These patches should not change the current behaviour in this case. > We never try to re-target the thread-specific signals. Note that > retarget_shared_pending() checks ->signal->shared_pending only. Ok, I clearly didn't follow the details closely enough. In that case, this series looks fairly ok to me. I'm still unsure whether it's _required_, but it looks sane and reasonable. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/