DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=nt1Ja5cLNKIq9iBaXwjx8lcyxMBRY3JZopsyetdcEUpb4b2u3joVB39h84zoyqZnkN
         B16j6mQbWSz4mn1qIh/mwnWV2hJ99UiboyiSjfGirWqlx+fTe940CJMvcZri1PBd6/yP
         kPCnm4XPaQYRNqoLriLgQBZzfaDo+xkJy/o2E=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4DAC75C6.2060504@caviumnetworks.com>
References: <7aa38c32b7748a95e814e5bb0583f967@localhost>
	<4DAC75C6.2060504@caviumnetworks.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:24:20 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTinbFNvez+G4LpmF7uwwJrH_J1NK8w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] MIPS: Replace _PAGE_READ with _PAGE_NO_READ
From: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 858
Lines: 20

On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:32 AM, David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> How much testing have you done on non-RI/XI CPUs?

On a non-RIXI CPU I was able to boot the system, run a basic GUI
application, create R/W shared mappings to /dev/mem, insert/remove
kernel modules, run a broken program that dumps core, etc.

I guess it would be a good idea to make sure swap still works.  Didn't
try that yet.

Can you think of anything else that might exercise the bits that were
touched by the patch?  Were there any tests you ran during the
development of RIXI support which uncovered subtle issues?

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/