Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:07:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:06:52 -0500 Received: from pcep-jamie.cern.ch ([137.138.38.126]:39440 "EHLO pcep-jamie.cern.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:06:33 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 17:34:56 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: Alexander Viro Cc: Chris Lattner , "Mohammad A. Haque" , Ben Ford , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, orbit-list@gnome.org, korbit-cvs@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux Kernel ORB: kORBit Message-ID: <20001214173456.A7639@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from viro@math.psu.edu on Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 09:06:54PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexander Viro wrote: > > Err... how about this: Give me two or three kORBit syscalls and I can get > > rid of all the other 100+ syscalls! :) > > Like it ioctl() does it? Number of entry points is _not_ an issue. Diversity > of the API is. Technically, kernel has 1 (_o_n_e_) entry point as far as > userland is concerned. int 0x80 on x86. Can't beat that, can you? If there's one thing that could be nicer, ioctl() would be it. ioctl() works ok in C and terribly in everything else. CORBA works well in scripting languages and Java, and sucks in C compared with a simple ioctl(). Is there a way to marry the best sides of each? Is 9P that way (I don't know much about it)? -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/