Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S317639AbSGUFaS>; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 01:30:18 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S317640AbSGUFaS>; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 01:30:18 -0400
Received: from astound-64-85-224-253.ca.astound.net ([64.85.224.253]:3846 "EHLO
	master.linux-ide.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S317639AbSGUFaR>; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 01:30:17 -0400
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 22:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org>
To: Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>,
       Thunder from the hill <thunder@ngforever.de>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Give Bartlomiej a break!  (Re: Impressions of IDE 98?)
In-Reply-To: <20020720221703.GE12637@louise.pinerecords.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10207202222320.23502-100000@master.linux-ide.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1591
Lines: 47


Tomas,

Give Bartlomiej a break!

I have been working with and teaching him how to read the document.
I refused to give him the answers, he had to learn it while I guided him.
It took about 3-4 evenings on IRC for Bart to get it, while he still has
much to learn that only time will grant him.  I got in a shorter period
than me, but I had to learn much if it on my own and only at the threshold
of getting did somebody in the storage industry give me a swift kick in
the pants.

Somebody submit a patch to make Bart the maintainer of 2.5.


Sincerely,

Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group

On Sun, 21 Jul 2002, Tomas Szepe wrote:

> > > I'm wondering, why haven't IDE 99 and IDE 100 been posted on lkml?
> > >
> > Ask Martin, I don't know.
> 
> Right. I'm puzzled here.
> 
> How safe does Martin think people will suppose the patches are if they were
> not meant to be reviewed in the standard lkml manner? Given the problems
> with 2.5.25 (and 'problems' would be an euphemism here) I'd expect to see
> something like a 'safer coding' approach, not 'stealth operations.'
> 
> T.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/