Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753493Ab1DSQyX (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:54:23 -0400 Received: from sous-sol.org ([216.99.217.87]:48450 "EHLO sequoia.sous-sol.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752783Ab1DSQyV (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:54:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:54:11 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: Alexander Hoogerhuis Cc: Chris Wright , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kaber@trash.net Subject: Re: A patch you wrote some time ago (aka: "[patch 41/54] ICMP: Fix icmp_errors_use_inbound_ifaddr sysctl") Message-ID: <20110419165411.GO9569@sequoia.sous-sol.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DADBBBC.6020803@boxed.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3177 Lines: 80 * Alexander Hoogerhuis (alexh@boxed.no) wrote: > I hope you (or anyone else) can spare half a minute to have a quick > look at a patch you wrote a few years ago: > > >http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/8/124 I actually did not write that patch, rather added it to the -stable tree. Patrick (CCd) wrote it. > I've been tracking down a case of ICMP Redirects originating from > the wrong IPs, and as far I can tell, you patch is the last to touch > this code (net/ipv4/icmp.c:507): > > > if (rt->fl.iif && net->ipv4.sysctl_icmp_errors_use_inbound_ifaddr) > > dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, rt->fl.iif); > > > >if (dev) > > saddr = inet_select_addr(dev, 0, RT_SCOPE_LINK); > >else > > saddr = 0; > > In a plain world this would work, but I have come across a case that > seems to be not handled by this. > > I have two machines set up with VRRP to act as routers out of a > subnet, and they have IPs x.x.x.13/28 and x.x.x.14/28, with VRRP > holding on to x.x.x.1/28. > > If a node in x.x.x.0/28 needs to get a ICMP redirect from x.x.x.1/28 > (to reach another subnet behind a different gateway in x.x.x.0/28), > then the source IP on the ICMP redirect is chosen as the primary IP > on the interface that the packet arrived at. > > This is as far as I can tell from RFCs and colleagues fine for most > things after you're routed one hop or more, but in the case of ICMP > redirect it means that the redirect is not adhered to by the client, > as it will get the reidrect from x.x.x.13/28, not x.x.x.1/28. > > inet_select_addr seems to be explicitly looking for the primary IP > in all cases (./net/ipv4/devinet.c:875), and in the case of sending > ICMP recdirect when in an VRRP setup, that would not work well. It > should try to match the actual inbound IP. > > Judging by the comments from your patch I am not sure if the source > IP that triggers the ICMP redirect is available at this point any > more. > > The way I understand it should pick adress is this way: > > > if (rt->fl.iif && net->ipv4.sysctl_icmp_errors_use_inbound_ifaddr) > > dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, rt->fl.iif); > > > > if (dev == fl.iif) > > saddr = iph->daddr; > > > > if (dev != fl.iif) > > saddr = inet_select_addr(dev, 0, RT_SCOPE_LINK); > > else > > saddr = 0; > > I.e. if we are replying to something that is from a local network > segment, then iph->daddr would be a more correct source. My C skill > is prehistoric so what I've written likely is far from correct, but > the general gist is that there is a special case for replying to > something local. > > As it stands today (I'm on 2.6.35.11), ICMP redirects when using > VRRP are broken, and I'm hoping I may have found out why. :) > > mvh, > A > -- > Alexander Hoogerhuis | http://no.linkedin.com/in/alexh > Boxed Solutions AS | +47 908 21 485 - alexh@boxed.no > "Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow." -Eric S. Raymond -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/