Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 04:27:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 04:27:51 -0400 Received: from mailout03.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.81]:47541 "EHLO mailout03.sul.t-online.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 04:27:50 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Oliver Neukum To: Andi Kleen , Alan Cox Subject: Re: [2.6] Most likely to be merged by Halloween... THE LIST Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 10:33:59 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1027199147.16819.39.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk.suse.lists.linux.kernel> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200207211033.59266.oliver@neukum.name> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 937 Lines: 23 Am Sonntag, 21. Juli 2002 08:57 schrieb Andi Kleen: > Alan Cox writes: > > > o EVMS (Enterprise Volume Management System) (EVMS team) > > > > or LVM2, which already appears to be scrubbed down and clean > > Is there any reason why not both can go in? As far as I know neither > of them needs much of core changes, they are more like independent > "drivers" of the generic block layer stacking interface. There are > already multiple drivers of this - LVM and the various MD personalities. The interfaces to filesystems for things like online resizing. If these are not compatible and stay compatible, you cause fs developers a lot of pain. Regards Oliver - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/