Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 08:24:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 08:24:44 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-5-cust12.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.121.12]:30197 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 08:24:44 -0400 Subject: Re: [2.6] Most likely to be merged by Halloween... THE LIST From: Alan Cox To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <1027199147.16819.39.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk.suse.lists.linux.ke rnel> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 21 Jul 2002 14:40:11 +0100 Message-Id: <1027258811.17234.90.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 651 Lines: 15 On Sun, 2002-07-21 at 07:57, Andi Kleen wrote: > One disadvantage of the LVM2 concept is that it relies a lot on compatible > user space and there is unlikely to be a stable API. While I'm normally > all for putting things in user space where it makes sense I think the > mounting of your root file system is a bit of exception. LVM2 relies on people doing things right so we shouldnt use it ? Strange - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/