Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754933Ab1DTNuV (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:50:21 -0400 Received: from smtp110.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com ([76.13.13.93]:40303 "HELO smtp110.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752890Ab1DTNuU (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:50:20 -0400 X-Yahoo-SMTP: _Dag8S.swBC1p4FJKLCXbs8NQzyse1SYSgnAbY0- X-YMail-OSG: gJkjJQoVM1mat7ULshxZTCtmQ5JR3UAB1M_8.cBrxmer08p LEMs2h4sFWYzRC0l5v6R1oK.muv.GjIns_EJ_kQ7UZXjYzQayjv0E8zFcfjZ C2EZUbfed8RjAhdAFkvY7tIGfxNzgD9TCUKmD3Ej4ZBKgWduaSmcYcI3bioY zkRDTG3qzI2X6WpA_TrHFepREnLX4xLn7J6rQoP_lNuKHXRfogJ8peWxyVbx 1VpegwErA0HZP8rsqn_Yc5rwi2parxe9mC09UFpbNcKiWIESsvbo0rCLDv7x qrjMMsVns6r84nz52fCGJW.h6R1Rbl8N20auyivSoak6wTon9RWD6fhLjLFQ CHdbkQivHRlBmx.y.ggP.6wv2 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:50:15 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@router.home To: KOSAKI Motohiro cc: James Bottomley , Pekka Enberg , Michal Hocko , Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, David Rientjes , Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: make expand_downwards symmetrical to expand_upwards In-Reply-To: <20110420115804.461E.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: References: <20110420102314.4604.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <1303267733.11237.42.camel@mulgrave.site> <20110420115804.461E.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1116 Lines: 26 On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > from arch/parisc/kernel/asm-offsets.c:31: > > include/linux/topology.h: In function 'numa_node_id': > > include/linux/topology.h:255: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_to_node' > > Sorry about that. I'll see more carefully the code later. Probably long > time discontig-mem uninterest made multiple level breakage. Grr. ;-) True. Someone needs to go through discontig and make it work right with a !NUMA configuration. Many pieces of the core code assume that there will be no node on a !NUMA config today. I guess that was different in ages past. Maybe we should make DISCONTIG broken under !NUMA until that time? Tejon was working on getting rid of DISCONTIG. SPARSEMEM is the favored alternative today. So we could potentially change the arches to use SPARSE configs in the !NUMA case. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/