Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 10:47:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 10:47:08 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:37133 "HELO garrincha.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 10:47:07 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 11:50:06 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Andrew Rodland cc: Martin Josefsson , , Subject: Re: memory leak? In-Reply-To: <20020722102658.731a2200.arodland@noln.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 936 Lines: 25 On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Andrew Rodland wrote: > On 21 Jul 2002 16:20:39 +0200 > Martin Josefsson wrote: > > > free don't know about slabcaches. take a look in /proc/slabinfo and > > see what's using that memory. it's not a leak, the memory will be > > free'd when the machine is under enough memory pressure. > > Yeah... look at that. looks like I've got quite a bit of memory > invested in inode_cache and dentry_cache. There's no way to have them > reported as "cache" memory anymore? Submit patches for procps to make free examine /proc/slabinfo ;) Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/