Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 12:38:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 12:38:46 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:29200 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 12:38:45 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 18:41:51 +0200 From: Dave Jones To: Markus Pfeiffer Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: CPU detection broken in 2.5.27? Message-ID: <20020721184151.A17463@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Markus Pfeiffer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200207211537.03813.mcp@linux-systeme.de> <3D3ADC3E.9050307@milliways.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3D3ADC3E.9050307@milliways.de>; from profmakx@profmakx.org on Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 06:07:26PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 897 Lines: 24 On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 06:07:26PM +0200, Markus Pfeiffer wrote: > I just noticed that my /proc/cpuinfo states wrong or incomplete > information about my processor. My PIII-1000M Processor is reported as > 00/0B (Stepping?) Yep, I told Patrick about this last week sometime. The problem is that only later Intels (from P4 onwards iirc) have the name string cpuid function. Without which we need a table to do the family/model/stepping translation to name strings. It's not that much work (and most of it already exists in the kernels before the per-cpu split up). Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/