Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 17:17:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 17:17:27 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:8713 "HELO garrincha.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 17:17:26 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 18:08:40 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: =?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: memory leak? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 731 Lines: 23 On 21 Jul 2002, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote: > Why can't proc/meminfo report these caches as cached instead of plain > used? Would that be incorrect somehow? The kernel exports the usage statistics in /proc/meminfo and /proc/slabinfo. IMHO it's up to userland to present this info in a meaningful way, no need to shove that piece of functionality into the kernel. regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/