Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:11:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:11:07 -0500 Received: from minus.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.97]:17158 "HELO ms2.inr.ac.ru") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:11:03 -0500 From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Message-Id: <200012141740.UAA02109@ms2.inr.ac.ru> Subject: Re: linux ipv6 questions. bugs? To: pete@research.netsol.com (Pete Toscano) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 20:40:20 +0300 (MSK) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20001213162512.N1139@tesla.admin.cto.netsol.com> from "Pete Toscano" at Dec 13, 0 04:25:12 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! > > Though... probably, you forgot to up loopback. > > doesn't look it: Funny, indeed. I have no idea what does happen. I cannot reproduce this. Please, describe your setup in more details. > that may very well be, but shouldn't the neighbor solisitation packets > from the linux box have the source mac address set to its mac address > and the destination mac address set to 0:0:0:0:0:0 and not the other way > around? What NS do you talk about, if you even cannot ping even loopback? 8)8)8) In such state you cannot expect of your system nothing but generating some crap. BTW these funny mac addresses are exaclty those one, which would be used on loopback, if it required ns. 8) Alexey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/