Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 06:07:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 06:07:31 -0400 Received: from sproxy.gmx.de ([213.165.64.20]:20248 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 06:07:30 -0400 Message-ID: <3D3BDA18.4070902@gmx.at> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 12:10:32 +0200 From: Wilfried Weissmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020623 Debian/1.0.0-0.woody.1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ville Herva , linux-kernel Subject: Re: File Corruption in Kernel 2.4.18 References: <3D362125.3A324489@atr.co.jp> <20020718072155.GB1548@niksula.cs.hut.fi> <3D367295.2010109@gmx.at> <20020718081630.GX1465@niksula.cs.hut.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2031 Lines: 47 Ville Herva wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 09:47:33AM +0200, you [Wilfried Weissmann] wrote: > >>[snip] >> >>>I repoduced the problem with wrchk utility I wrote >>>(http://iki.fi/v/tmp/wrchk.c) but it seems you can do it with you directory >>>tree copying. >> >>I got to check this out! > > > I had the problem to appear almost certainly when doing wrchk to raw disks > (you should be able to use large files just as well), two writes in parallel > (eg. /dev/hde, /dev/hdg). Occasionally it took ~50GB of writing before it > happened (multiple rounds), but it always did. I did a simultaneous: wrck /dev/hd[fh] 0 64 2 The two disks were connected to the HPT-370 controller and both were configured as slave (the masters are configured into an ataraid-0 and contain my root partition). The test disk were IBM DLTA 307030 (30GB) with updated firmware. These disks are locked down to ata-44 by the kernel and I only got a maximum I/O speed of 21.7 MB/s. During the read phase one of the disks always slowed down, while the other disk proceeded at normal speed. In the first run I got 7.2 MB/s and at the second run the other disk slowed down to crawling 5.3 MB/s, but the test was completed without any errors. *joy* However I am not that the test did stress the chipset enough to trigger the error because of the throughput is so low. My mainboard is a abit kt7-raid (VIA KT133 chipset), BIOS version 3R. Memory bus was reduced to 100 MHz (SDR). Linux kernel 2.4.18 tainted by NVidia(TM). ;) DivX 5.0 seems to be a good stability test for VIA chipset based motherboards. It finds errors that not even memtest could detect. greetings, Wilfried PS: I will do another run on my raid-0 root partition. The 2 disks that are part of the raid run at ata-100 (Maxtor 40GB). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/