Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 19:31:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 19:31:06 -0400 Received: from fusion.wineasy.se ([195.42.198.105]:39428 "HELO fusion.wineasy.se") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 19:31:06 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 01:34:10 +0200 From: Andreas Schuldei To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: using bitkeeper to backport subsystems? Message-ID: <20020721233410.GA21907@lukas> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1066 Lines: 23 I want to use/track the linuxconsole project (especially for its Multi-desktop operation), which tracks 2.5 on the stable tree 2.4. is bitkeeper the easiest way to go? i imagine the patch sets to be like transformations, which can be superimposed, so i would clone marcellos and linus tree, generate a linuxconsole patchset against linus tree and backport it to marcellos tree. (there are older backports, which should make my live easier.) I imagine that i had two 'transforms' now: first the linuxconsole transform, which changes over time as the project (and the kernel) moves on, and the backport transform, which i hope to remain more static. Can i superimpose these transforms? Is this how it works? has anyone done this before? is there a howto or could someone outline the bitkeeper steps needed? Any catches? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/