Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S316632AbSGVKYF>; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 06:24:05 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S316649AbSGVKYE>; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 06:24:04 -0400
Received: from fusion.wineasy.se ([195.42.198.105]:18440 "HELO
	fusion.wineasy.se") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S316632AbSGVKYE>;
	Mon, 22 Jul 2002 06:24:04 -0400
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 12:27:05 +0200
From: Andreas Schuldei <andreas@schuldei.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: using bitkeeper to backport subsystems?
Message-ID: <20020722102705.GB21907@lukas>
References: <20020721233410.GA21907@lukas> <20020722071510.GG16559@boardwalk> <20020722102930.A14802@lst.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020722102930.A14802@lst.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 636
Lines: 14

* Christoph Hellwig (hch@lst.de) [020722 10:29]:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 01:15:10AM -0600, Val Henson wrote:
> > Sigh.  I hate this question: "How will BitKeeper make it easier to
> > port something between 2.4 and 2.5?"  Answer: "Bk won't help - at
> > least not as much as it would help if 2.5 had been cloned from 2.4."
> 
> 2.5 _is_ cloned from 2.4..

can one make use of that somehow?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/