Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 21:05:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 21:05:50 -0400 Received: from rj.SGI.COM ([192.82.208.96]:34754 "EHLO rj.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 21:05:50 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Keith Owens To: Kai Germaschewski Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] 2.5.25 net/core/Makefile In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 21 Jul 2002 18:56:24 EST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 11:08:41 +1000 Message-ID: <25972.1027300121@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 797 Lines: 18 On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 18:56:24 -0500 (CDT), Kai Germaschewski wrote: >Makes sense to me. However, the CONFIG_ variables used in the Makefiles >are never "n", they are "y", "m" or undefined. > >In Config.in scripts you have to cater for "n" or "", and I've seen >various people on l-k carry this behavior into the Makefiles, but there >it's unnecessary for all I can tell. It is required if you ever want autoconfigure to work, that distinguishes between "" (undefined) and "n" (explicitly turned off). Forward planning. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/