Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750951Ab1DYEVc (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:21:32 -0400 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:53773 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750714Ab1DYEVb (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:21:31 -0400 X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1 From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: john stultz Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] break out page allocation warning code Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, David Rientjes , Dave Hansen , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner , Michal Nazarewicz , Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <20110421103009.731B.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <1303331695.2796.159.camel@work-vm> <20110421103009.731B.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-Id: <20110425132333.266E.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.56.05 [ja] Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:21:28 +0900 (JST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1491 Lines: 32 > > > I'd prefer that we remove /proc/pid/comm entirely or at least prevent > > > writing to it unless CONFIG_EXPERT. > > > > Eeeh. That's probably going to be a tough sell, as I think there is > > wider interest in what it provides. Its useful for debugging > > applications not kernels, so I doubt folks will want to rebuild their > > kernel to try to analyze a java issue. > > > > So I'm well aware that there is the chance that you catch the race and > > read an incomplete/invalid comm (it was discussed at length when the > > change went in), but somewhere I've missed how that's causing actual > > problems. Other then just being "evil" and having the documented race, > > could you clarify what the issue is that your hitting? > > The problem is, there is no documented as well. Okay, I recognized you > introduced new locking rule for task->comm. But there is no documented > it. Thus, We have no way to review current callsites are correct or not. > Can you please do it? And, I have a question. Do you mean now task->comm > reader don't need task_lock() even if it is another thread? > > _if_ every task->comm reader have to realize it has a chance to read > incomplete/invalid comm, task_lock() doesn't makes any help. ping? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/