Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 06:26:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 06:26:02 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([212.34.181.86]:61449 "EHLO verein.lst.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 06:26:01 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 12:29:05 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Andreas Schuldei Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: using bitkeeper to backport subsystems? Message-ID: <20020722122905.A16423@lst.de> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Andreas Schuldei , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20020721233410.GA21907@lukas> <20020722071510.GG16559@boardwalk> <20020722102930.A14802@lst.de> <20020722102705.GB21907@lukas> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020722102705.GB21907@lukas>; from andreas@schuldei.org on Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 12:27:05PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 780 Lines: 19 On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 12:27:05PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote: > * Christoph Hellwig (hch@lst.de) [020722 10:29]: > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 01:15:10AM -0600, Val Henson wrote: > > > Sigh. I hate this question: "How will BitKeeper make it easier to > > > port something between 2.4 and 2.5?" Answer: "Bk won't help - at > > > least not as much as it would help if 2.5 had been cloned from 2.4." > > > > 2.5 _is_ cloned from 2.4.. > > can one make use of that somehow? /me ain't no bk guru. but I'd be interested in that, too. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/