Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 09:46:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 09:45:54 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([212.34.181.86]:14604 "EHLO verein.lst.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 09:43:57 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 15:46:56 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Russell King , Linus Torvalds , Robert Love , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] cli()/sti() cleanup, 2.5.27-A2 Message-ID: <20020722154656.A19039@lst.de> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Ingo Molnar , Russell King , Linus Torvalds , Robert Love , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20020722152056.A18619@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from mingo@elte.hu on Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 03:43:50PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 810 Lines: 16 On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 03:43:50PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > i'm not so sure about flags_t. 'unsigned long' worked pretty well so far, > and i do not see the need for a more complex (or more opaque) irqflags > type. It's not that we confuse flags with some other flag all that > frequently that would necessiate some structure-based more abstract > protection of these variables. It's just that we don't really care what it is. But the type change wasn't my main point, rather the returning of the flags value in irq_save to allow implementing it as non-macro. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/