Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S316585AbSGVI0h>; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 04:26:37 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S316586AbSGVI0h>; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 04:26:37 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de ([212.34.181.86]:44040 "EHLO verein.lst.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S316585AbSGVI0h>;
	Mon, 22 Jul 2002 04:26:37 -0400
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 10:29:30 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Val Henson <val@nmt.edu>
Cc: Andreas Schuldei <andreas@schuldei.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: using bitkeeper to backport subsystems?
Message-ID: <20020722102930.A14802@lst.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Val Henson <val@nmt.edu>,
	Andreas Schuldei <andreas@schuldei.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20020721233410.GA21907@lukas> <20020722071510.GG16559@boardwalk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20020722071510.GG16559@boardwalk>; from val@nmt.edu on Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 01:15:10AM -0600
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 541
Lines: 12

On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 01:15:10AM -0600, Val Henson wrote:
> Sigh.  I hate this question: "How will BitKeeper make it easier to
> port something between 2.4 and 2.5?"  Answer: "Bk won't help - at
> least not as much as it would help if 2.5 had been cloned from 2.4."

2.5 _is_ cloned from 2.4..

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/