Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 06:20:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 06:20:25 -0400 Received: from moutvdom01.kundenserver.de ([195.20.224.200]:41542 "EHLO moutvdom01.kundenserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 06:20:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 04:23:29 -0600 (MDT) From: Thunder from the hill X-X-Sender: thunder@hawkeye.luckynet.adm To: Szakacsits Szabolcs cc: Thunder from the hill , Alan Cox , Adrian Bunk , Robert Love , Subject: Re: [PATCH] strict VM overcommit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-Location: Dorndorf; Germany MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 845 Lines: 25 Hi, On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote: > Potentially you _will_ lose data in swapoff case. Kernel could know > when it's save to do but no way for admin to calculate. The difference is between you will definitely loose data and you will potentially loose data. Regards, Thunder -- (Use http://www.ebb.org/ungeek if you can't decode) ------BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK------ Version: 3.12 GCS/E/G/S/AT d- s++:-- a? C++$ ULAVHI++++$ P++$ L++++(+++++)$ E W-$ N--- o? K? w-- O- M V$ PS+ PE- Y- PGP+ t+ 5+ X+ R- !tv b++ DI? !D G e++++ h* r--- y- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/