Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 09:45:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 09:45:51 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([212.34.181.86]:16908 "EHLO verein.lst.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 09:45:12 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 15:48:11 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Mark Mielke Cc: Thunder from the hill , Val Henson , Andreas Schuldei , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: using bitkeeper to backport subsystems? Message-ID: <20020722154811.A19085@lst.de> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Mark Mielke , Thunder from the hill , Val Henson , Andreas Schuldei , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20020722102930.A14802@lst.de> <20020722124627.A16636@lst.de> <20020722094505.A20319@mark.mielke.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020722094505.A20319@mark.mielke.cc>; from mark@mark.mielke.cc on Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 09:45:05AM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 586 Lines: 12 On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 09:45:05AM -0400, Mark Mielke wrote: > It would have been very foolish to not clone 2.4. Worst case would have > 2.5 cloned from 2.3 or 2.2, but the version tree would still be intact, > just a little indirect. (As far as I am aware, 2.5 is cloned from 2.4) Just that there were no official 2.2/2.3 Linux BK trees.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/